UNITED STATES 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 

Washington, DC 20549  

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the 

Securities Exchange Act of 1934  

Filed by the Registrant  ☒                            Filed by a party other than the Registrant  ☐ 

Check the appropriate box: 

VERITONE, INC. 

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter) 

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant) 

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box): 

VERITONE, INC.

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

July 24, 2020

To the Stockholders of Veritone, Inc.:

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Veritone, Inc. will be held on Friday, July 24, 2020, at 9:30 a.m., Pacific Time.  The annual meeting will be a virtual meeting via live webcast on the Internet. Stockholders may attend the annual meeting online by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/VERI2020. The annual meeting is being held for the purpose of considering and acting upon the following:

The foregoing items of business are more fully described in the proxy statement accompanying this notice.  

Only stockholders of record at the close of business on June 2, 2020 are entitled to notice of and to vote at the meeting.  All such stockholders are cordially invited to attend the meeting.  However, to ensure your representation at the meeting, you are urged to vote by proxy prior to the meeting.  If you attend the meeting, you may vote during the meeting even if you have voted by proxy.

We encourage you to access the virtual annual meeting before the start time of 9:30 a.m., Pacific Time, on July 24, 2020, to allow ample time for online check-in, which will begin at 9:15 a.m.  To attend the meeting, you will need the 16-digit control number provided on your proxy card or voting instruction form.

By order of the Board of Directors

/s/ Jeffrey B. Coyne

Jeffrey B. Coyne

Executive Vice President, General Counsel

and Secretary

June 25, 2020

Costa Mesa, California

VERITONE, INC.

PROXY STATEMENT

General Information

Proxy Statement and Solicitation of Proxies

Solicitation by Board

This proxy statement is being furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies by our Board of Directors (the “Board”) for use at our Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on Friday, July 24, 2020 at 9:30 a.m., Pacific Time via live webcast on the Internet.

Solicitation of Proxies and Related Expenses

We will bear all expenses incurred in connection with this solicitation.  We anticipate that this solicitation of proxies will be made primarily by mail; however, in order to ensure adequate representation at the annual meeting, our directors, officers and other employees may communicate with stockholders, brokerage houses and others by telephone, facsimile or electronic transmission, or in person, to request that proxies be furnished.  We may reimburse banks, brokerage houses, custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for their reasonable expenses in forwarding proxy materials to the beneficial owners of the shares held by them.  No additional compensation will be paid to our directors, officers or other employees for solicitation of proxies by such individuals.

Record Date and Voting Securities

Our Board has fixed the close of business on June 2, 2020 as the record date for the determination of stockholders entitled to receive notice of and to vote at the annual meeting.  As of the record date, there were 27,098,995 shares of our common stock outstanding and entitled to vote.  Each stockholder is entitled to one vote for each share of common stock held as of the record date.

Availability of Materials

On or about June 25, 2020, we are mailing this proxy statement and our Annual Report on Form 10-K and Amendment No. 1 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for our fiscal year ended December 31, 2019, to all stockholders of record on the record date for the annual meeting.  Except as may be required by Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) rules and regulations, our Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended, is not to be regarded as proxy soliciting material or as communications by means of which any solicitation is to be made.  

We will provide without charge to each stockholder solicited by these proxy solicitation materials a copy of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019, as amended, without exhibits upon request of such stockholder made in writing to Veritone, Inc., 575 Anton Boulevard, Suite 100, Costa Mesa, California 92626, Attention: Chief Financial Officer.  We will also furnish any exhibit to such Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended, if specifically requested in writing.

Stockholders Sharing the Same Address

SEC rules permit us to deliver one copy of our proxy statement and Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended, to two or more stockholders who share an address, unless we have received contrary instructions from one or more of the stockholders. This delivery method, which is known as “householding,” reduces our printing costs, mailing costs and fees. Upon request, we will promptly deliver a separate copy of either document to you if you write us at our corporate offices at Veritone, Inc., 575 Anton Boulevard, Suite 100, Costa Mesa, California 92626, Attn: Chief Financial Officer or call us at (888) 507-1737. If you are a stockholder and share an address and last name with one or more other stockholders and would like to revoke your householding consent, or you are a stockholder eligible for householding and would like to participate in householding, please notify your broker, bank or other nominee (each, a “Nominee”) if your shares are held in “street name” or contact us at the above address or telephone number.

1

Attending the Annual Meeting

We have decided to hold our annual meeting as a virtual meeting this year to allow for greater participation by our stockholders while helping protect the health and safety of our stockholders, directors and employees due to public health concerns related to the COVID-19 pandemic.  The virtual meeting has been designed to provide stockholders with the same rights to participate as they would have at an in-person meeting.  All stockholders of record on the record date will be able to attend the meeting online, submit questions and vote shares electronically during the meeting.  We intend to answer questions submitted by stockholders that are pertinent to the business of the annual meeting, as time permits.

The virtual annual meeting will begin at 9:30 a.m., Pacific Time, on July 24, 2020.  You may attend the meeting by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/VERI2020.  We encourage you to access the virtual meeting before the start time to allow ample time for online check-in, which will begin at 9:15 a.m, to test Internet connectivity and to submit questions before the start of the annual meeting.  To attend the virtual meeting, you will need the 16-digit control number provided on your proxy card or voting instruction form.  All proxyholders and all stockholders of record on the record date who attend the virtual meeting will be deemed to be present in person at the annual meeting.

Even if you plan to attend the virtual annual meeting, we recommend that you vote your shares in advance, so that your vote will be counted if you later decide not to attend the meeting.

Quorum

A quorum is the number of shares of capital stock of a corporation that must be present in person or represented by proxy in order to transact business. A majority of our shares of common stock entitled to vote, present in person or represented by proxy, will constitute a quorum at the annual meeting. Both abstentions and broker non-votes, each described below, are counted for the purpose of determining the presence of a quorum.

Abstentions

When an eligible voter attends the annual meeting, in person or by proxy, but decides not to vote on a proposal, the voter’s decision not to vote is called an “abstention.”  Properly executed proxy cards that are marked “abstain” on any proposal will be treated as abstentions for that proposal.  We will treat abstentions as follows:

Broker Non-Votes

Broker non-votes occur when shares held in “street name” by a Nominee for a beneficial owner are not voted with respect to a particular proposal because (i) the Nominee does not receive voting instructions from the beneficial owner, and (ii) the Nominee lacks discretionary authority to vote the shares.  We will treat broker non-votes as follows:

2

A Nominee only has discretionary authority to vote shares on a proposal that is considered a “routine” matter under applicable rules and related guidance.  The proposal for the ratification of the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm is considered a “routine” matter and, accordingly, a Nominee has discretionary authority to vote shares on such proposal.  The election of directors and the approval of the amendments to our 2018 Performance-Based Stock Incentive Plan and performance-based stock options are considered “non-routine” matters and, accordingly, a Nominee does not have discretionary authority to vote shares on such proposals.

Vote Required

A quorum at the annual meeting is required for the approval of any of the proposals set forth herein.  Directors will be elected by a plurality of the votes cast on the election of directors.  The approval of the amendments to our 2018 Performance-Based Stock Incentive Plan and the Performance Awards (as defined in Proposal Three beginning on page 35) requires (1) the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the total votes of shares of our common stock cast in person or by proxy at the annual meeting, pursuant to the rules of NASDAQ and our Bylaws, and (2) the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the total votes of shares of our common stock cast in person or by proxy at the annual meeting other than shares of our common stock owned, directly or indirectly, by Chad Steelberg or Ryan Steelberg and their affiliates cast in person or by proxy at the annual meeting, pursuant to the resolutions of our Board and the Compensation Committee approving such amendments.  The approval of other proposals to be considered at the annual meeting requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the total votes of shares of our common stock cast at the annual meeting in person or by proxy.

Voting of Proxies

Stockholders may vote by proxy or in person at the annual meeting.  To vote by proxy, stockholders may vote by Internet, telephone or mail.  The instructions and information needed to access our proxy materials and vote by Internet can be found in the proxy card.  

If you are the beneficial owner of shares held by a Nominee, then your Nominee, as the record owner of the shares, must vote those shares in accordance with your instructions.  Please refer to the voting instruction form that your Nominee makes available to you for voting your shares.

Two of our officers, Peter F. Collins and Jeffrey B. Coyne, have been designated by our Board as proxies for voting on matters brought before the annual meeting.  Each proxy properly received by us prior to the annual meeting, and not revoked, will be voted in accordance with the instructions given in the proxy.  If a choice is not specified in the proxy, the proxy will be voted (i) FOR the election of the director nominees listed therein; (ii) FOR the ratification of the appointment of Grant Thornton LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2020; and (iii) FOR the approval of the amendments to our 2018 Performance-Based Stock Incentive Plan and performance-based stock options.

Revoking a Proxy

Any proxy may be revoked or superseded by giving notice of revocation in writing prior to the commencement of the annual meeting, by executing and delivering a later proxy prior to the commencement of the annual meeting, or by voting at the annual meeting.  Attendance at the annual meeting will not in and of itself constitute revocation of a submitted proxy.  Any written notice revoking a proxy should be sent to our Secretary at our corporate offices at 575 Anton Boulevard, Suite 100, Costa Mesa, CA 92626, and must be received prior to the commencement of the annual meeting.

If your shares are held in the name of a Nominee, you may change your vote by submitting new voting instructions to your Nominee.  Please contact your Nominee for further instructions on changing your vote.

Stockholder Proposals

Any stockholder desiring to submit a proposal for action at our 2021 annual meeting of stockholders and presentation in our proxy statement for such meeting should deliver the proposal to us at our corporate offices no later than February 25, 2021 in order to be considered for inclusion in our proxy statement relating to that meeting in accordance with Rule 14a-8 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).  Matters pertaining to proposals, including the number and length thereof, eligibility of persons entitled to have such proposals included in the proxy statement and other aspects are covered by Rule 14a-8 and other laws and regulations, to which interested persons should refer.  

3

In addition, under our amended and restated bylaws (“Bylaws”), any stockholder who is entitled to vote at a meeting of stockholders and who intends to propose business at such meeting must provide timely written notice to our Secretary.  To be timely, a stockholder’s written notice must be received by our Secretary at our principal executive offices no later than the close of business on the ninetieth (90th) day nor earlier than the close of business on the one hundred twentieth (120th) day prior to the one-year anniversary of our annual meeting. As a result, any notice given by a stockholder pursuant to the provisions of our Bylaws in connection with our 2021 annual meeting of stockholders must be received no earlier than March 26, 2021 and no later than April 25, 2021.  However, if our 2021 annual meeting occurs more than thirty (30) days before or more than sixty (60) days after July 24, 2021, in order to be timely, notice by the stockholder must be received by our Secretary no later than the close of business on the later of the ninetieth (90th) day prior to the scheduled date of our 2021 annual meeting or the tenth (10th) day following the day on which public announcement of the date of such meeting is first made.

Such notice must set forth as to each matter that the stockholder proposes to bring before any meeting of stockholders: (1) a brief description of the business desired to be brought before the meeting and the reasons for conducting such business at the meeting; (2) the name and record address of the stockholder giving such notice, and the names and addresses of the beneficial owner(s), if different, on whose behalf the business proposed to be brought before a meeting of stockholders is made (collectively, the “Proposing Person(s)”); (3) certain information regarding the ownership interests of each such Proposing Person, or any of its affiliates or associates, in our securities; (4) any material interest of each such Proposing Person in such business; and (5) certain other information required to be included in any such notice, as described in Article I, Section 2(a)(2) of our Bylaws, including, but not limited to, information regarding any transactions, agreements or arrangements giving the Proposing Persons other interests in or related to our capital stock, or any agreements, arrangements or understandings by and among the Proposing Persons and any other person pertaining to the business proposed to be brought before the annual meeting.  Stockholders providing notice of proposed business to be brought before an annual meeting must also follow the procedures set forth in our Bylaws pertaining to updates and supplements to the information contained in such notice.

Rule 14a-4 promulgated under the Exchange Act governs our use of our discretionary proxy voting authority with respect to a stockholder proposal that is not addressed in our proxy statement.  Such rule provides that if a proponent of a proposal fails to notify us with respect to such proposal at least 45 days prior to the current year’s anniversary of the date of mailing of the prior year’s proxy statement, then we will be allowed to use our discretionary voting authority when the proposal is raised at the annual meeting, without any discussion of the matter in the proxy statement.  We anticipate that our next annual meeting of stockholders will be held in June 2021.  If we do not receive any stockholder proposals for our 2021 annual meeting in accordance with the requirements of Rule 14a-4(c)(1) promulgated under the Exchange Act, we will be able to use our discretionary voting authority as outlined above.  In addition, if the stockholder does not comply with the requirements of Rule 14a-4(c)(2) promulgated under the Exchange Act, we may exercise discretionary voting authority under proxies that we solicit to vote in accordance with our best judgment on any such stockholder proposal.

Other Matters

Management is not aware of any other matters that will be presented for consideration at our annual meeting.  

Veritone Corporate Office

Our corporate offices are located at 575 Anton Boulevard, Suite 100, Costa Mesa, California 92626.

4

Proposal One

Election of Directors

Board of Directors

The size of our Board is currently fixed at seven directors.  There are currently seven directors serving on our Board with no vacancies.  Our Board is divided into three classes, with each director serving a three-year term, and one class being elected at each year’s annual meeting of stockholders.  Class I consists of two directors, Class II consists of two directors, and Class III consists of three directors.  The terms of our current Class III directors will expire at our 2020 annual meeting.  Our Class I directors will continue to serve until our annual meeting in 2021, and our Class II directors will continue to serve until our annual meeting in 2022.  

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that the number of directors of our company will be fixed solely and exclusively by resolution duly adopted from time to time by our Board. Any additional directorships resulting from an increase in the number of directors may only be filled by the directors then in office unless otherwise required by law or by a resolution passed by our Board. The term of office for each director will be until his or her successor is elected at an annual meeting of stockholders or his or her death, resignation or removal, whichever is earliest to occur.

Director Nominees

Based upon the recommendation of our Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, our Board has nominated the individuals set forth below to serve as Class III directors until our annual meeting of stockholders in 2023.  Each nominee is currently serving on our Board.

G. Louis Graziadio, III has served as our director since August 2016. Since March 1990, Mr. Graziadio has been President and Chief Executive Officer of Second Southern Corp., the managing partner of Ginarra Partners, L.L.C., a closely-held company involved in a wide range of investments and business ventures.  Mr. Graziadio is also Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Boss Holdings, Inc., a distributor of consumer goods. From August 2016 to June 2018, Mr. Graziadio served as the Executive Chairman of Acacia Research Corporation (“Acacia”), a leading patent licensing firm. From 1984 to 2000, Mr. Graziadio served as a director of Imperial Bancorp, the parent company of Imperial Bank, a Los Angeles-based commercial bank acquired by Comerica Bank in January 2001. Mr. Graziadio, and companies with which he is affiliated, are significant shareholders in numerous private and public companies in a number of different industries. Since 1978, Mr. Graziadio has been active in restructurings of both private and public companies, as well as corporate spin-offs and initial public offerings. Mr. Graziadio previously served as a director of True Religion Apparel, Inc., a publicly traded premium clothing company, from May 2005 until its sale in July 2013, and as a director of World Point Terminals, LP, a previously publicly traded company which owns, operates, develops, and acquires terminal assets relating to the storage of light refined products and crude oil, from August 2013 to August 2017. In addition, Mr. Graziadio is a member of the Pepperdine University Board and the Board of Visitors of the Graziadio School of Business and Management at Pepperdine University. He is also a founding member of the board of directors of the Los Angeles Fire Department Scholarship Fund. We believe that Mr. Graziadio is qualified to serve on our Board due to his extensive experience as a member of senior management at several different companies, as well as his expertise in the area of finance, investment and capital market transactions. In addition, his experience in serving on the boards of directors of public companies provides our Board with valuable skills and capabilities to help guide the governance of our company.

5

Chad Steelberg is a co-founder of our company and has served as our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board since our inception in June 2014. From January 2007 to December 2012, he served as a board member of Brand Affinity Technologies, Inc., a technology and marketing services company. Prior to that, Mr. Steelberg served as the general manager of the Audio Division of Google Inc. from February 2006 to February 2007. From February 2002 to February 2007, he was the co-founder and Chief Executive Officer of dMarc Broadcasting, an advertising company that was acquired by Google Inc. in 2006. Prior to that, Mr. Steelberg was the co-founder and Chief Executive Officer of Adforce, a publicly traded centralized independent ad-serving company that was acquired by CMGi in 1999. We believe that Mr. Steelberg is qualified to serve on our Board based on his long and successful track record in identifying new market opportunities and creating disruptive technology-based companies. In addition, Mr. Steelberg’s intimate knowledge of the day-to-day management and operations of our company provides our Board with an in-depth understanding of our company.

Ryan Steelberg is a co-founder of our company and has served as a director since our inception in June 2014 and as the President of our subsidiary, Veritone One, Inc., since June 2015. In March 2017, he was appointed as President of our company. From October 2007 to December 2014, he served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Brand Affinity Technologies, Inc. Prior to that, Mr. Steelberg served as the Head of the Radio Division of Google Inc. from February 2006 to February 2007. From September 2002 to February 2007, he was the co-founder and President of dMarc Broadcasting, an advertising company that was acquired by Google Inc. in 2006. We believe that Mr. Steelberg is qualified to serve on our Board because of his extensive experience in the business development, marketing and management of enterprises in the media and digital technology industries. In addition, Mr. Steelberg’s intimate knowledge of our operations and technology provides our Board with an in-depth understanding of our company.

Unless otherwise instructed, each proxy received by us will be voted in favor of the election of the nominees named above as directors.  The nominees have indicated that they are willing and able to serve as directors if elected.  If any nominee should become unable or unwilling to serve, it is the intention of the persons designated as proxies to vote instead, in their discretion, for any such other person as may be designated as a nominee by our Board.  

Our Board recommends a vote “FOR” the election of the nominees named in this proxy statement as directors.

Continuing Directors

The following directors will continue to serve on our Board:

Jeff P. Gehl has served as our director since May 2017. Since 2001, Mr. Gehl has been a Managing Partner of RCP Advisors, a private equity firm he co-founded. Mr. Gehl is responsible for leading RCP’s client relations and fund-raising activities, as well as its relationships with private equity fund managers in the Western United States, and he also serves as a member of the investment committees and advisory boards of various funds in which RCP is invested. Prior to co-founding RCP, he was involved in a number of private equity-financed companies, where he held senior positions in finance and operations. In addition, Mr. Gehl founded and served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of MMI, a technical staffing company, and acquired Big Ballot, Inc., a sports marketing firm. He also serves as a director of P10 Holdings, Inc., an asset management investment firm that is the parent company of RCP, and as a director of Super League Gaming, Inc., a leading amateur esports platform provider. Mr. Gehl received a Bachelor of Science degree in Business Administration from the University of Southern California’s Entrepreneur Program, where he received the “Entrepreneur of the Year” award in 1989. We believe that Mr. Gehl is qualified to serve on our Board based on his extensive experience in financing, developing and managing high-growth technology companies.

6

Knute P. Kurtz has served as our director since June 2017. Until his retirement in June 2016, Mr. Kurtz was the Managing Partner of the Orange County office of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”). During his ten years in that role, Mr. Kurtz was responsible for leading all important market facing activities on behalf of PwC and overseeing the delivery of assurance, financial/tax and advisory services to public and private clients in the market. He was a member of PwC’s senior leadership for the Southern California, Phoenix and Las Vegas cluster of offices and also served as the Market Leader for PwC’s Private Company Services practice in that region. Prior to his role in the Southern California market, Mr. Kurtz served in various other leadership positions with PwC over a career that spanned 38 years and six offices throughout the United States. His professional experience includes serving as the lead advisor and audit partner to public and private clients in a number of different industry sectors and companies as diverse as Fortune 500 companies to high tech start-up entities. In addition to financial/audit services, he has extensive experience in capital market transactions including initial public offerings, mergers and acquisitions and debt offerings. His client work has also included advising audit committees and senior management on matters pertaining to corporate governance, risk assessments, internal controls and strategic initiatives. We believe that Mr. Kurtz is qualified to serve on our Board based on his extensive experience and knowledge in accounting and auditing matters involving publicly traded technology companies, which provide our Board with valuable insight in their oversight of our company in these areas.

Nayaki R. Nayyar has served as our director since October 2018.  Since October 2016, Ms. Nayyar has served as President of Digital Service and Operations Management at BMC Software, Inc., a leading enterprise software solutions provider. Prior to joining BMC Software, Inc., Ms. Nayyar served as General Manager and Global Head of the Internet of Things (IoT) division of SAP SE, a leading provider of enterprise application software, from January 2016 to October 2016. She joined SAP SE in 2011, holding the positions of Senior Vice President, Corporate Strategy, from March 2011 to December 2011, and Senior Vice President, SAP Cloud, Customer Engagement, from January 2012 to December 2015. Ms. Nayyar also served as Vice President and Chief Technical Officer, Enterprise Architecture and Application Services, at Valero Energy Corporation, an international petroleum company, from August 2000 to February 2011.  Ms. Nayyar currently serves on the board of directors of Corteva, Inc., a publicly traded agriculture company. We believe that Ms. Nayyar is qualified to serve on our Board due to her technical expertise in enterprise cloud software and IoT technologies, and her extensive experience in leading large teams in complex global organizations through acquisitions, technology transitions and growth phases, which provide valuable insight to our Board with respect to our technology and growth strategies.

Richard H. Taketa has served as our director since May 2019. Since September 2018, Mr. Taketa has been President of Taketa Capital Corporation, a private equity investment and consulting company.  Previously, he served as President and Chief Executive Officer of York Risk Services, Inc. (“York”), a leading provider of technology-enabled, integrated insurance services to the property and casualty insurance industry, from January 2014 to September 2018, and served as Chairman of York’s board of directors from October 2014 to July 2017.  Prior to becoming CEO at York, Mr. Taketa served in a variety of capacities including as the President of Commercial Business, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Strategy Officer.  Mr. Taketa joined York in 2006 upon its acquisition of Southern California Risk Management Associates, a regional provider of third-party administration services to insurance companies, where he had served as Chief Executive Officer since 2004.  Prior to that, he was a co-founder and managing director of Eventide Capital, a small private equity firm, after working as a corporate securities lawyer with DLA, a global law firm and in various public policy roles with non-governmental organizations in Washington, D.C.  Mr. Taketa currently serves on the board of directors of Palomar Holdings, Inc., a publicly traded provider of property catastrophe insurance, and has also served on the boards of directors of several privately-held companies.  He was named an Ernst & Young’s Entrepreneur of the Year in 2017 for the State of New Jersey.  He has been a recurring guest lecturer at the Stanford Graduate School of Business and is a member of the California Bar Association, inactive status.  Mr. Taketa holds a Bachelor of Arts degree from Colgate University and a law degree from Stanford Law School.  We believe that Mr. Taketa is qualified to serve on our Board based on his extensive experience in financing, developing and managing high-growth, technology-enabled companies, as well as his experience in the insurance and healthcare industries, corporate law and governance, mergers and acquisitions, public policy, and operating in regulated markets.

7

Other Directorships

Mr. Gehl currently serves on the boards of directors of two other publicly reporting companies, P10 Holdings, Inc. and Super League Gaming, Inc.  Mr. Gehl does not currently serve, and during the past five years has not served, on the board of directors of any other publicly reporting company or investment company.  

Mr. Graziadio previously served on the boards of directors of two other publicly reporting companies, Acacia until June 2018, and World Point Terminals, LP until August 2017.  Mr. Graziadio does not currently serve, and during the past five years has not served, on the board of directors of any other publicly reporting company or investment company.

Ms. Nayyar currently serves on the board of directors of one other publicly reporting company, Corteva, Inc. Ms. Nayyar does not currently serve, and during the past five years has not served, on the board of directors of any other publicly reporting company or investment company.

Mr. Taketa currently serves on the board of directors of one other publicly reporting company, Palomar Holdings, Inc.  Mr. Taketa previously served on the board of directors of one other publicly reporting company, York Risk Services Holding Corp., until September 2018.  Mr. Taketa does not currently serve, and during the past five years has not served, on the board of directors of any other publicly reporting company or investment company.

No other director currently serves, or during the past five years has served, on the board of directors of any other publicly reporting company or investment company.

Corporate Governance

Board Independence

Our Board has determined that five of our seven current directors, Ms. Nayyar and Messrs. Gehl, Graziadio, Kurtz and Taketa, are independent, as determined in accordance with the rules of NASDAQ and the SEC. Nathaniel L. Checketts and Christopher J. Oates, who served on our Board until May 2019 and June 2019, respectively, were also determined by the Board to be independent in accordance with such rules.  In making such independence determination, our Board considered the relationships that each non-employee director has with us and all other facts and circumstances that the Board deemed relevant in determining their independence.

Board Leadership Structure

Chad Steelberg, our Chief Executive Officer, serves as our Chairman of the Board. The Chairman has authority, among other things, to preside over Board meetings and set the agenda for Board meetings. Accordingly, the Chairman has substantial ability to shape the work of our Board. We currently believe that the combination of the roles of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer is appropriate for our business and affairs. Mr. Steelberg has extensive knowledge and experience in the management and operation of software and digital media companies, and an in-depth understanding of our business strategies and day-to-day operations, which make him well suited to set the agenda and lead the discussions at Board meetings as the Chairman. This also facilitates communications between our Board and management by ensuring a regular flow of information, thereby enhancing our Board’s ability to make informed decisions on critical issues facing our company. However, no single leadership model is right for all companies and at all times. Our Board recognizes that depending on the circumstances, other leadership models, such as the appointment of a lead independent director, might be appropriate. Accordingly, our Board may periodically review its leadership structure.

Board Role in Risk Management

Management continually monitors the material risks we face, including financial risk, strategic risk, enterprise and operational risk and legal and compliance risk. The Board is responsible for exercising oversight of management’s identification and management of, and planning for, those risks. In fulfilling this oversight role, our Board focuses on understanding the nature of our enterprise risks, including our operations and strategic direction, as well as the adequacy of our risk management process and overall risk management system. Our Board performs these functions in a number of ways, including the following:

8

Meetings

It is the policy of our Board to hold at least four regular, in-person meetings each year, typically one in each calendar quarter.  In addition, our Board holds special meetings as and when deemed necessary by the directors.  

Our Board held six meetings (including telephonic meetings) during the year ended December 31, 2019.  Each director attended more than seventy-five percent of the aggregate of the number of meetings of our Board (held during the period in which he or she served as a director) and the total number of meetings held by all committees of our Board on which he or she served (held during the period in which he or she served on such committees).

We have not adopted a formal policy regarding attendance by members of our Board at our annual meetings of stockholders; however, generally, we expect that all directors will attend such meetings.  With the exception of Mr. Kurtz and Paul A. Krieger (who served on our Board until June 2019), all of our directors who were serving at the time of our 2019 annual meeting of stockholders attended such meeting.  

Private Sessions

Our independent directors meet privately, without management present, at least four times during the year.  These private sessions are generally held in conjunction with the regular quarterly Board meetings.  Other private meetings are held as often as deemed necessary by the independent directors.  

Committees of Our Board

Our Board has three separate standing committees: the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee.  Each committee operates under a written charter adopted and reviewed annually by our Board, which satisfy the applicable standards of the SEC and NASDAQ.  Copies of the charters of all standing committees are available on our website at investors.veritone.com under “Governance.”  We will also provide electronic or paper copies of the standing committee charters free of charge, upon request made to our Secretary.  Our Board may establish other committees from time to time as deemed appropriate by our Board based on the needs of our Board and the company.

Audit Committee

Our Audit Committee consists of Messrs. Graziadio, Kurtz and Taketa, and Mr. Kurtz serves as the Chairman. Messrs. Checketts and Oates served on our Audit Committee until they resigned from the Board in May 2019 and June 2019, respectively.  Our Board has affirmatively determined that each member serving on the Audit Committee currently or during 2019 meets the definition of an “independent director” for purposes of serving on an audit committee under Rule 10A-3 of the Exchange Act and NASDAQ rules.  In addition, our Board has determined that each of Messrs. Graziadio, Kurtz and Taketa qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert,” as such term is defined in Item 407(d)(5) of Regulation S-K. Each member of the Audit Committee will be financially literate at the time such member is appointed.  The Audit Committee held nine meetings (including telephonic meetings) during the year ended December 31, 2019.

Our Audit Committee has the responsibility to, among other things:

9

Compensation Committee

Our Compensation Committee consists of Ms. Nayyar and Messrs. Gehl and Taketa, and Mr. Taketa serves as the Chairman. Messrs. Checketts and Oates served on our Compensation Committee until May 2019 and June 2019, respectively.  Our Board has determined that each member serving on the Compensation Committee currently or during 2019 is “independent” as that term is defined in the applicable SEC and NASDAQ rules. The Compensation Committee held four meetings (including telephonic meetings) during the year ended December 31, 2019.

Our Compensation Committee has the responsibility to, among other things:

Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee

Our Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee consists of Messrs. Gehl, Graziadio and Kurtz, and Mr. Gehl serves as the Chairman. Messrs. Checketts and Oates served on our Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee until May 2019 and June 2019, respectively.  Our Board has determined that each member serving on the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee currently or during 2019 is “independent” as that term is defined in the applicable NASDAQ rules. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee held four meetings during the year ended December 31, 2019.

Our Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee has the responsibility to, among other things:

10

Identifying and Evaluating Director Candidates

Our Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee evaluates and recommends director candidates for nomination by the full Board.  Any stockholder may recommend candidates for evaluation by the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee by submitting a written recommendation to our Secretary in accordance with the requirements described under the heading “Stockholder Nominations” below.  

There are no specific minimum qualifications that the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee requires to be met by a director nominee recommended for a position on our Board, nor are there any specific qualities or skills that are necessary for one or more members of our Board to possess, other than as are necessary to meet the requirements of the laws, rules and regulations applicable to us.  Except as required by applicable law, our Board does not have a formal policy regarding racial/ethnic, gender or other diversity characteristics of director candidates, but considers diversity as a factor in evaluating such candidates.  

Our corporate headquarters are located in Costa Mesa, California and, as such, we are subject to the requirements of Section 301.3 of the California Corporations Code, which provide that (i) currently, we must have a minimum of one female director on our Board, and (ii) based on the current size of our Board, we must have a minimum of three female directors on our Board by the end of 2021.  The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will take these requirements into account in evaluating and recommending director candidates for nomination to the Board.

The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will evaluate any director candidates recommended by stockholders in the same manner as it would evaluate any other candidates identified by or recommended to the committee.

Stockholder Nominations

In accordance with our Bylaws, stockholders may nominate a candidate for election as director by following the procedures described in the section entitled “Stockholder Proposals” on page 3, including delivery of a written notice to our Secretary within the time periods and containing the information specified in that section.  In addition, any notice relating to one or more director nominations must set forth as to each person whom the stockholder proposes to nominate for election or reelection as a director, all information relating to such person that is required to be disclosed in solicitations of proxies for election of directors in an election contest, or is otherwise required, in each case pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Exchange Act.  Any such notice must be accompanied by such person’s written consent to be named in the proxy statement as a nominee and to serving as a director if elected.  If the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee or our Board determines that any nomination made by a stockholder was not made in accordance with the foregoing procedures, the rules and regulations of the SEC or other applicable laws or regulations, such nomination will be void.  

Communications with Our Board

Any stockholder may communicate with our Board, any Board committee or any individual director.  All communications should be made in writing, addressed to our Board, our Board committee or the individual director, as the case may be, in care of our Secretary, mailed or delivered to our corporate offices at 575 Anton Boulevard, Suite 100, Costa Mesa, California 92626.  Our Secretary will forward or otherwise relay all such communications to the intended recipient(s).

11

Corporate Responsibility

Code of Ethics

Our Board has adopted a code of business conduct and ethics, which is applicable to our principal executive, financial and accounting officers and all persons performing similar functions. A copy of that code is available in the Investors section of our principal corporate website at investors.veritone.com under the heading “Governance.” We will also provide an electronic or paper copy of the code of ethics, free of charge, upon request made to our Secretary.  If any substantive amendments are made to the written code of ethics, or if any waiver (including any implicit waiver) is granted from any provision of the code of ethics to our principal executive, financial and accounting officers, we will disclose the nature of such amendment or waiver on our website at www.veritone.com or, if required, in a current report on Form 8-K.

Procedures for Submitting Complaints Regarding Accounting and Auditing Matters

We are committed to compliance with all applicable securities laws and regulations, accounting standards and accounting controls.  The Audit Committee has established written procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints received by us regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters, and the confidential, anonymous submission by our employees of concerns or complaints regarding such matters.  The Audit Committee oversees the handling of such concerns or complaints.  Any person may report concerns or complaints regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters by sending a communication in writing addressed to the Audit Committee, in care of our General Counsel, mailed or delivered to our corporate offices at 575 Anton Boulevard, Suite 100, Costa Mesa, California 92626.  Our General Counsel will forward such communication to the Chairman of the Audit Committee.  Additional information regarding the procedures for non-employees to submit such concerns or complaints is available in the Investors section of our website at investors.veritone.com under the heading “Governance.”

Executive Officers

We currently have four executive officers who serve at the pleasure of our Board and are elected on an annual basis:

The biographies of Chad Steelberg and Ryan Steelberg are presented on page 6.  The biographies of our other executive officers are set forth below.

Peter F. Collins has served as our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since May 2017 and previously as our Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from October 2016 to May 2017. From May 2014 to October 2016, Mr. Collins served as Chief Financial Officer at J Brand Holdings, LLC, a premium clothing company and a subsidiary of Fast Retailing Co., Ltd. From March 2007 to July 2013, Mr. Collins served as Chief Financial Officer of True Religion Apparel Inc., a publicly traded premium clothing company. From April 2004 to March 2007, he served as Divisional Vice President, Corporate Controller and Principal Accounting Officer for Nordstrom, Inc., a publicly traded department store chain. From 2002 to 2004, Mr. Collins served in various financial roles with Albertson’s, Inc., a supermarket chain, including Group Vice President and Controller. Prior to that, from 1998 until 2002, Mr. Collins was a partner with Arthur Andersen LLP, serving clients in the healthcare, retail, distribution and manufacturing industries.

12

Jeffrey B. Coyne has served as our Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary since October 2016. From July 2004 to April 2016, Mr. Coyne served as Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary, with responsibility for legal affairs and human resources, at Newport Corporation, a global supplier of advanced technology products that was acquired by MKS Instruments, Inc., and from June 2001 to July 2004, he served as Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary of Newport Corporation. Prior to that, Mr. Coyne was a partner in the Corporate and Securities Law Department of Stradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth, P.C. from January 2000 to June 2001, and was an associate attorney at such firm from February 1994 to December 1999. From November 1991 to February 1994, Mr. Coyne was an associate attorney at Pillsbury Madison & Sutro LLP (now Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP), an international law firm. Mr. Coyne is a member of the State Bar of California.

Family Relationships

There are no family relationships between any director, executive officer or person nominated or chosen to become a director or executive officer, except that Chad Steelberg and Ryan Steelberg are brothers.

Legal Proceedings

On December 15, 2014, Brand Affinity Technologies, Inc. filed a petition for relief under the Bankruptcy Code commencing the matter of In re Brand Affinity Technologies, Inc., United States Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California, Santa Ana Division, Case No. 8:14-bk-17244 SC. Chad Steelberg and Ryan Steelberg previously served as officers, directors and beneficial owners of Brand Affinity Technologies, Inc. The Bankruptcy Court entered an order closing this bankruptcy case on December 5, 2016.

Executive Compensation

The following is a summary of the compensation policies, plans and arrangements that were in effect for our executive officers during 2018 and 2019.  This summary should be read in conjunction with the Summary Compensation Table and related disclosures set forth below. We are eligible to, and have chosen to, comply with the executive compensation disclosure rules applicable to a “smaller reporting company,” as defined in applicable SEC rules.

We have entered into new employment agreements with Chad Steelberg and Ryan Steelberg effective as of June 15, 2020, which are discussed under the heading “2020 Employment Agreements with Chad Steelberg and Ryan Steelberg” beginning on page 18.  The compensation arrangements set forth in these new employment agreements will replace and supersede the compensation plans and arrangements discussed in this summary with respect to Chad Steelberg and Ryan Steelberg.  

Overview

Our executive compensation plans and arrangements are overseen and administered by our Compensation Committee, which is comprised entirely of independent directors as determined in accordance with applicable NASDAQ and SEC rules.  The Compensation Committee operates under a written charter adopted and reviewed annually by our Board.  A copy of this charter is available on our website at investors.veritone.com under the heading “Governance.”  

Our Compensation Committee has established an executive compensation program that is intended to fulfill three primary objectives: first, to attract and retain the high caliber executives required for the success of our business; second, to reward these executives for strong financial and operating performance; and third, to align their interests with those of our stockholders to incentivize them to create long-term stockholder value.  The key components of this executive compensation program are base salaries, cash incentives, and equity awards, as discussed in more detail below.  

13

In December 2017, the Compensation Committee engaged a compensation consultant, Pearl Meyer & Partners, LLC (“Pearl Meyer”), to conduct a market study of executive compensation and make recommendations regarding the base salaries, cash incentive compensation and equity compensation for our executive officers.  Pearl Meyer reviewed compensation data reported by a group of publicly traded software-as-a-service companies with annual revenues between $50 million and $150 million, with average revenues of approximately $100 million.  The Compensation Committee determined that this group of companies, which has higher revenues than Veritone, was an appropriate peer group for this analysis, as it represented the size of companies with which we compete for executive talent.  Specifically, Pearl Meyer reviewed base salaries, target cash incentives and annual equity compensation for the companies in this group, and provided recommendations to the Compensation Committee.  In November 2018, Pearl Meyer provided updates to this market data and its recommendations, based on general trend data.  

The Compensation Committee reviewed the market data and recommendations that had been provided by Pearl Meyer in 2017, and used such data and recommendations to establish compensation levels and plans for our executive officers for 2018.  The Compensation Committee also considered such market data and recommendations, and the updates thereto provided by Pearl Meyer in November 2018, in its review of compensation of our executive officers for 2019.  Such market data indicated that the target total cash compensation and target total direct compensation of our executive officers were both significantly below the 50^th percentile of the peer group.    

As part of its review of executive compensation in 2018, the Compensation Committee also discussed with Pearl Meyer whether it would be in the best interests of Veritone and our stockholders to develop a separate performance-based equity incentive program for our Chief Executive Officer, our President, and our other executive officers and employees, to provide them with an additional incentive to drive increases in stockholder value.  The Compensation Committee determined that such a program would tie a large portion of each participant’s total earnings potential to the achievement of challenging stockholder value targets, which would give them a powerful incentive to drive increases in stockholder value and strongly align their interests with the interests of our stockholders. Due to the potential interests of Chad Steelberg and Ryan Steelberg in such program, on the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, the Board appointed a special committee comprised of independent and disinterested members of the Board (the “Special Committee”), which had the exclusive authority to develop and negotiate such performance-based equity incentive program on behalf of our Board.  In May 2018, our Board approved our 2018 Performance-Based Stock Incentive Plan (the “2018 Plan”) and the Special Committee approved awards of performance-based stock options to Chad Steelberg and Ryan Steelberg, subject to stockholder approval, which was received in June 2018.  The 2018 Plan and the awards of performance-based stock options under that plan in 2018 and 2019 are discussed in more detail under the heading “2018 Performance-Based Stock Incentive Plan” below.  In June 2020, the Compensation Committee and the disinterested members of our Board approved certain amendments to the 2018 Plan and the performance-based stock options granted to our executive officers and other employees, subject to stockholder approval, as discussed in more detail under the heading “Amendments to Performance-Based Stock Options” below.  

Base Salaries

In November 2018, the Compensation Committee reviewed the base salaries of our executive officers, taking into consideration the market data and recommendations received from Pearl Meyer as discussed above, and determined that no changes would be made to base salaries for 2019.  Accordingly, the annual base salary of each executive officer for 2019 was set at $250,000, which was the same amount that had been established by the Compensation Committee effective as of March 2018.  

Cash Incentives

The Compensation Committee established a cash incentive program for our executive officers to link a significant portion of each executive’s total compensation to the achievement of pre-established financial performance goals.  Under the cash incentive program, a target incentive amount is established for each executive officer for each year.  The Compensation Committee establishes target and maximum levels for each financial measure, with the target level corresponding to the level for such measure reflected in our annual operating plan and the maximum level reflecting significant overachievement of the target level.  Achievement of the target level for a measure results in a payout of 100% of the target incentive amount tied to that financial measure, and achievement of the maximum level for such measure results in a payout of 200% of the target incentive for such measure.  Payouts are prorated on a straight-line basis in the event of achievement between the target and maximum levels for the applicable financial measure.

14

For 2019, the Compensation Committee set each executive officer’s target cash incentive at $75,000 (30% of base salary).  Payouts of the cash incentives for all executive officers were conditioned upon achievement of the targets set forth in the annual operating plan approved by our Board for 2019 for two financial measures, weighted equally, as follows: (i) net revenues of $61.7 million, and (ii) earnings (loss) before interest expense, depreciation, amortization and stock-based compensation expenses, adjusted to exclude certain acquisition, integration and financing-related costs (“Adjusted EBITDAS”) of a loss of $30.4 million.

Our net revenues for 2019 were $49.6 million, and our Adjusted EBITDAS for 2019 was a loss of $36.2 million.  As a result, we did not achieve the target level for either of the financial measures established under the cash incentive program for 2019, and no cash incentives were earned by our executive officers for 2019.

Adjusted EBITDAS is a non-GAAP measure.  An explanation of Adjusted EBITDAS and a reconciliation of this non-GAAP measure to our net loss calculated in accordance with GAAP for 2019 is included under the heading “Non-GAAP Financial Measure” in Part II, Item 7 (Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations) of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019.

Equity Incentives

We provide long-term incentive compensation to our executive officers through equity-based awards under our stock incentive plans, such as stock options, restricted stock and restricted stock units.  

2014 Plan and 2017 Plan

Our 2014 Stock Option/Stock Issuance Plan (the “2014 Plan”) was approved by our Board and stockholders in 2014, and our 2017 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2017 Plan”) was approved by our Board and stockholders at the time of our initial public offering (“IPO”) in May 2017.  Under these plans, the Compensation Committee or our Board has authority to grant awards of incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock and/or restricted stock units to our executive officers, directors, employees and consultants.  Our Board resolved not to make any further awards under the 2014 Plan following the completion of our IPO.  The 2014 Plan will continue to govern all outstanding awards granted thereunder.  

All stock options granted under the 2014 Plan and 2017 Plan have exercise prices equal to or greater than the fair market value of our common stock on the grant date, and expire 10 years after the grant date, subject to earlier expiration in the event of termination of the awardee’s continuous service with the company.  All equity awards granted under the 2014 Plan and 2017 Plan vest in accordance with the vesting schedules established by the Compensation Committee at the time of award, subject to the awardee’s continued service with our company.  The vesting of equity awards granted to our executive officers is subject to acceleration under certain circumstances as discussed under the heading “Payments Upon Termination of Employment or Change in Control” below.

In February 2019, the Compensation Committee granted equity awards to each of Messrs. Collins and Coyne under the 2017 Plan, consisting of stock options and restricted stock units.  Each of Messrs. Collins and Coyne received a nonqualified option to purchase 15,000 shares of our common stock, which has an exercise price of $5.65 and had a grant date fair value of approximately $53,000 (determined using the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model).  Such options vest over a four-year period, with 25% of the shares underlying such options vesting on the first anniversary of the grant date, and the remaining shares underlying such options vesting in 36 equal monthly installments thereafter, subject to acceleration under certain circumstances as discussed under the heading “Payments Upon Termination of Employment or Change in Control” below.  In addition, each of Messrs. Collins and Coyne received an award of restricted stock units representing the right to receive upon vesting 16,845 shares of our common stock, which had a total grant date value of approximately $95,000 based on the closing stock price of our common stock on the grant date.  Such restricted stock units vested in full in January 2020.

The Compensation Committee did not grant equity awards to Chad Steelberg or Ryan Steelberg in 2019 in light of the performance-based stock options awarded to them in 2018 under the 2018 Plan, as discussed below.  

15

2018 Performance-Based Stock Incentive Plan

The following is a summary of our 2018 Plan and the awards of performance-based stock options that were made to our named executive officers under the 2018 Plan in 2018 and 2019.  See the section entitled “Amendments to Performance-Based Stock Options” below for a discussion regarding certain amendments to such awards that were approved by the Compensation Committee and the disinterested members of our Board on June 12, 2020, subject to approval by our stockholders.  

In May 2018, our Board approved our 2018 Plan, and the Special Committee approved awards of performance-based stock options to Chad Steelberg (the “CEO Award”) and Ryan Steelberg (the “President Award”) under the 2018 Plan.  The CEO Award, President Award and 2018 Plan were approved by our stockholders in June 2018.

The CEO Award, the President Award and all awards granted to our other executive officers and employees under the 2018 Plan are 100% performance-based, vesting only upon the achievement of stock price targets that would represent significant increases in our stock price.  All awards granted under the 2018 Plan consist of nonstatutory stock options, which will become exercisable in three equal tranches only if we achieve the following stock price goals:

Each tranche will be determined to be achieved if our stock price equals or exceeds the applicable stock price goal for thirty consecutive trading days (each, a “Stock Price Milestone”).  All stock options granted under the 2018 Plan have exercise prices equal to or greater than the fair market value of our common stock on the grant date, and expire 10 years after the grant date, subject to earlier expiration in the event of termination of an awardee’s service with the company.

The numbers of shares of common stock underlying the CEO Award and the President Award are 1,809,900 and 1,357,425, respectively, and the exercise price of such awards is $21.25 per share, which was the closing price of our common stock on May 4, 2018, the last trading day prior to the date of approval of the awards by the Special Committee (which was not a trading day).  The vesting of the CEO Award is contingent upon Chad Steelberg being employed as our Chief Executive Officer, and the vesting of the President Award is contingent upon Ryan Steelberg being employed as President or in such other position as may be approved by the Compensation Committee.  If Chad Steelberg’s service as Chief Executive Officer, or if Ryan Steelberg’s service as President (or such other position), is terminated by us (other than for misconduct), any outstanding and unexercisable portion of the award held by him will remain outstanding and eligible to become exercisable for a period of nine months following such termination (or until the expiration date of the award, if earlier). At that time, any portion of his award that has not become exercisable will be forfeited.  The CEO Award and the President Award provide that any shares issued upon exercise thereof must be held by the executive officer for a minimum of six months, to further align the executive officer’s interests with the interests of our other stockholders following the exercise of such options.

On February 12, 2019, the Compensation Committee granted to each of Messrs. Collins and Coyne an option to purchase 26,001 shares of our common stock under the 2018 Plan.  Such stock options have an exercise price of $5.65 per share, which was the closing price of our common stock on the grant date.  The vesting of each such award is contingent upon the executive officer remaining employed by us.  If the executive officer is terminated by us (other than for misconduct), any outstanding and unexercisable portion of the award held by him will remain outstanding and eligible to become exercisable for a period of nine months following such termination (or until the expiration date of the award, if earlier). At that time, any portion of his award that has not become exercisable will be forfeited.

We have utilized substantially all of the shares available for grant under the 2018 Plan.  No awards will be granted under the 2018 Plan in the future.

16

Amendments to Performance-Based Stock Options

Due to the significant decline in our stock price since the adoption of the 2018 Plan, the Compensation Committee has determined that the 2018 Plan is not achieving its intended goals.  On June 12, 2020, the Compensation Committee, and the disinterested members of our Board, authorized, subject to stockholder approval, certain amendments to the 2018 Plan, the stock option award agreements evidencing awards under the 2018 Plan (including the CEO Award, the President Award and the awards to Messrs. Collins and Coyne), and certain stock option award agreements entered into pursuant to our 2017 Plan on substantially the same terms as the 2018 Plan (collectively, the “Performance Awards”).  A summary of such amendments is set forth below.  See “Proposal Three – Approval of Amendments to 2018 Performance-Based Stock Incentive Plan and Performance-Based Stock Options” beginning on page 35 for a detailed discussion regarding such amendments, including additional background and the factors considered by the Compensation Committee in evaluating and approving such amendments.

The amendments to the 2018 Plan and the Performance Awards include:

If approved by our stockholders, the Compensation Committee intends to make these amendments to the 2018 Plan and the Performance Awards pursuant to its authority under Section 3.5(a) of the 2018 Plan and Section 3.7(a) of the 2017 Plan.  

Generally Available Benefit Programs

Section 401(k) Plan

We make available a tax-qualified retirement plan that provides eligible employees, including our executives, with an opportunity to save for retirement on a tax advantaged basis.  Participants are able to defer up to 80% of their eligible compensation, subject to applicable annual limits under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Internal Revenue Code”).  Pre-tax contributions are allocated to each participant’s individual account and are then invested in selected investment alternatives according to the participant’s directions. We do not currently make any matching contributions under the 401(k) plan.

Employee Stock Purchase Plan

We maintain an employee stock purchase plan (the “ESPP”), which is intended to qualify as an “employee stock purchase plan” under Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code, to promote stock ownership by employees. Under the ESPP, eligible employees are able to acquire shares of our common stock by accumulating funds through payroll deductions. Eligible employees are able to select a rate of payroll deduction between 1% and 15% of their eligible compensation. The ESPP is implemented through a series of offering periods of up to 27 months, each having multiple purchase intervals, which are generally six months, unless otherwise determined by our Compensation Committee as the plan administrator.

17

The purchase price for shares of our common stock under the ESPP is established by our Compensation Committee prior to the start of any offering period, but will not be less than 85% of the lower of the fair market value of our common stock on (i) the first day of each offering period and (ii) the purchase date for each purchase interval. Purchases under the ESPP are subject to certain limitations, including a maximum number of shares that each participant may purchase on each purchase date of 1,000 shares, a maximum number of shares that may be purchased in total by all participants on each purchase date of 200,000 shares, and the $25,000 annual limit under the Internal Revenue Code. In addition, under no circumstances will purchase rights be granted under the ESPP to any eligible employee if such individual would, immediately after the grant, own or hold outstanding options or other rights to purchase stock possessing 5% or more of the total combined voting power or value of all classes of stock of our company or any parent or subsidiary.

Health Benefit Programs

Our executive officers are eligible to participate in our health benefit programs, including medical, dental, vision, long-term disability, life and accidental death and dismemberment insurance, flexible spending accounts and certain other benefits.  We pay 100% of the premiums for the medical, dental, vision, long-term disability and life insurance elected by Messrs. Collins and Coyne under these company-provided benefits (excluding the premiums for voluntary supplemental disability). Chad Steelberg and Ryan Steelberg do not currently participate in these benefit programs; however, we reimburse each of them for 100% of the costs for their separate healthcare plans.

2017 Employment Agreements with Chad Steelberg and Ryan Steelberg

In March 2017, we entered into employment agreements with Chad Steelberg and Ryan Steelberg. Each employment agreement had an initial term of three years and renewed automatically in March 2020.  These employment agreements had specified cash compensation levels for each executive officer, which were subject to periodic review and adjustment at the discretion of our Board or our Compensation Committee, and provided for grants of time-based and performance-based stock options to each executive officer in 2017.  Our executive compensation program that was established by the Compensation Committee for 2018 and 2019 amended and superseded the compensation terms set forth in these employment agreements.

2020 Employment Agreements with Chad Steelberg and Ryan Steelberg

In June 2020, we entered into new employment agreements with Chad Steelberg and Ryan Steelberg, which supersede the employment agreements previously entered into with such officers in 2017 and the compensation plans and arrangements established for them in 2018 and 2019.  Each employment agreement has an initial term expiring on December 31, 2022, which will renew automatically for additional one-year terms unless either we or the officer elects not to renew the agreement by providing written notice to the other party at least 90 days prior to the expiration of the then-current term.

Pursuant to these employment agreements, the annual base salaries of Chad Steelberg and Ryan Steelberg have been set at $500,000 and $375,000, respectively.  Each officer’s base salary is subject to review by our Board at least annually and, in any event, shall be increased by no less than 5% annually.  Each officer may, subject to certain conditions, elect to receive up to 25% of his base salary during any calendar quarter in the form of fully vested stock awards issued under our stock incentive plans (with the number of shares determined based on the average of the daily volume-weighted average prices per share of our common stock during the quarter).

The employment agreements also provide that each officer will be entitled to receive annual incentive bonuses, with a target incentive amount equal to at least 120% of his then-current annual base salary for Chad Steelberg and 100% for Ryan Steelberg.  50% of the incentive amount will tied to the achievement of annual performance goals with earned amounts paid annually, and 50% of the incentive amount will be tied to the achievement of quarterly performance goals with earned amounts paid quarterly.  However, Chad Steelberg will receive a total bonus each year equal to at least 50% of his then-current base salary, and Ryan Steelberg will receive a total bonus each year equal to at least 25% of his then-current base salary, whether or not the applicable performance goals have been achieved.

18

Pursuant to the employment agreements, each of Chad Steelberg and Ryan Steelberg received an initial award of restricted stock units representing the right to receive upon vesting 350,000 shares of our common stock and 140,000 shares of our common stock, respectively.  In addition, commencing in 2021, Chad Steelberg will be entitled to receive on an annual basis (a) an award of restricted stock units representing the right to receive upon vesting 175,000 shares of our common stock, and (b) an award of restricted stock units representing the right to receive upon vesting a number of shares of our common stock determined by dividing $150,000 by the average of the daily volume-weighted average prices of our common stock for the ninety (90) calendar day period ended on the last trading day prior to the grant thereof.  Commencing in 2021, Ryan Steelberg will be entitled to receive on an annual basis (a) an award of restricted stock units representing the right to receive upon vesting 125,000 shares of our common stock, and (b) an award of restricted stock units representing the right to receive upon vesting a number of shares of our common stock determined by dividing $75,000 by the average of the daily volume-weighted average prices of our common stock for the ninety (90) calendar day period ended on the last trading day prior to the grant thereof.  Each such restricted stock unit award will vest in full on the first anniversary of the grant date.  

The employment agreements provide for payment of other benefits to each officer including (i) payment of a commuting allowance of $25,000 per calendar quarter for Chad Steelberg and $12,500 per quarter for Ryan Steelberg, (ii) purchase of separate healthcare policies covering the officer and his family, (iii) reimbursement of legal fees reasonably incurred in the negotiation of both officers’ employment agreements, up to a maximum of $50,000, and (iv) other benefits generally made available to employees under our employee benefit plans.

The employment agreements with Chad Steelberg and Ryan Steelberg are at-will agreements and may be terminated at any time and for any reason or without reason. However, if the officer is terminated other than for cause  (as defined in his employment agreement) or resigns for good reason (as defined in his employment agreement), then the officer will be entitled to receive cash severance payments and acceleration of the vesting of certain of his equity awards, as discussed under the heading “Payments Upon Termination of Employment or Change in Control” below.

Roles of Compensation Consultants in Determining Executive Compensation

The Compensation Committee has the authority to engage its own compensation consultants and other independent advisors to assist in designing and administering our executive compensation programs.  As noted above, the Compensation Committee directly engaged Pearl Meyer to conduct a market study of executive compensation, which included a review and analysis of executive cash and equity compensation, in December 2017, and to provide updates to such market study in November 2018.  For this market study, Pearl Meyer was requested by the Compensation Committee to present assessments of our compensation levels relative to our peer companies and to provide recommendations regarding the compensation levels and the structure of our cash and equity compensation plans.  In March 2018, the Special Committee engaged Pearl Meyer to assist it in developing and negotiating the 2018 Plan and the grants of awards to Chad Steelberg and Ryan Steelberg thereunder.

The Compensation Committee has evaluated the relationships among the company, the Compensation Committee and Pearl Meyer, taking into account the following six factors: (i) the provision of other services to the company by Pearl Meyer, if any; (ii) the amount of fees received from the company by such consultant, as a percentage of its total revenue; (iii) the policies and procedures of such consultant that are designed to prevent conflicts of interest; (iv) any business or personal relationships of such consultant with a member of the Compensation Committee; (v) any company stock owned by such consultant; and (vi) any business or personal relationships of such consultant with any of the company’s executive officers, and has determined that no conflicts of interest have been raised by the work performed by such consultant in making recommendations relating to the company’s executive compensation.

Roles of Management in Determining Executive Compensation

The Compensation Committee periodically meets with our Chief Executive Officer and/or other executive officers to obtain recommendations with respect to compensation programs for executives and other employees.  Our Chief Executive Officer makes recommendations to the Compensation Committee on the base salaries, target incentives and performance measures, and equity compensation for our executives and other key employees.  The Compensation Committee considers, but is not bound to accept, management’s recommendations with respect to executive compensation. Our Chief Executive Officer and certain other executives attend most of the Compensation Committee’s meetings, but the Compensation Committee also holds private sessions outside the presence of members of management.  The Compensation Committee discusses our Chief Executive Officer’s compensation package with him, but makes decisions with respect to his compensation without him present.  The Compensation Committee has delegated to management the authority to make certain decisions regarding compensation for employees other than executive officers.  The Compensation Committee has not delegated any of its authority with respect to the compensation of executive officers.

19

Summary Compensation Table

The following table sets forth compensation earned during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 by our principal executive officer, Chad Steelberg; our principal financial officer, Peter F. Collins; and our two other most highly compensated executive officers who were serving as executive officers at December 31, 2019; as well as the grant date fair values of share-based compensation awarded to such officers during such fiscal years, calculated in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, Compensation – Stock Compensation (“ASC Topic 718”).  These officers are referred to in this proxy statement as the “named executive officers.”

20

Outstanding Equity Awards at 2019 Fiscal Year End

The table below sets forth information regarding outstanding equity awards held by each named executive officer as of December 31, 2019, including: (i) the numbers of shares of our common stock underlying exercisable and unexercisable stock options, and unearned performance-based stock options, held by each named executive officer and the exercise prices and expiration dates thereof; and (ii) the aggregate number of restricted stock units and shares of restricted stock held by each named executive officer, and the market value thereof, that had not vested as of December 31, 2019.    

21

The vesting of equity awards held by the named executive officers is subject to each officer’s continued service with our company, and is subject to acceleration under certain circumstances as discussed under the heading “Payments Upon Termination of Employment or Change in Control” below.

Payments Upon Termination of Employment or Change in Control

Chad Steelberg and Ryan Steelberg

Pursuant to the terms of the employment agreements entered into with each of Chad Steelberg and Ryan Steelberg in June 2020, if the officer’s employment is terminated by us without cause (as defined in his employment agreement) or due to his death or disability (as defined in his employment agreement), or the officer resigns for good reason (as defined in his employment agreement), then 50% of any unvested portion of any equity awards held by the officer (other than the performance-based stock options granted to him under the 2018 Plan) will immediately vest, and all stock options held by the officer (other than the performance-based stock options granted to him under the 2018 Plan) will remain exercisable until the expiration of the term of such stock option.  In addition, the officer shall be entitled to receive (i) his annual incentive bonus for the year in which the termination occurs, prorated based on the completed portion of the applicable performance period through the date of termination, with any performance metrics based on actual performance as determined at the end of the annual performance period, and (ii) a severance payment equal to the sum of his annual base salary and his target annual incentive bonus, multiplied by 1.5, which amount will be paid in thirty-six (36) equal installments through salary continuation in accordance with our normal payroll practices.  

In the event of a change in control of Veritone, if the officer’s employment is terminated without cause (as defined in his employment agreement) or due to his death or disability (as defined in his employment agreement), or the officer resigns for good reason (as defined in his employment agreement) during the six-month period prior to such change in control or 12-month period following such change in control, the officer shall be entitled to the same benefits and payments described above, except that such officer shall also be entitled to an additional severance payment equal to the sum of his annual base salary and his target annual incentive bonus, multiplied by 3.5, which amount shall be payable in a lump sum upon the officer’s termination.

Pursuant to the terms of our 2018 Plan, in the event of a change in control of Veritone, vesting of the performance-based stock options granted under the 2018 Plan will not automatically accelerate.  However, upon a change in control, the achievement of the applicable stock price goals with respect to such performance-based stock options will be determined based on the greater of (a) the last closing price of a share of our common stock before the effective time of the change in control or (b) the per share price (plus the per share value of any other consideration) received by our stockholders in the change in control, without regard to the requirement that the applicable stock price goal be met or exceeded for 30 consecutive trading days. Any exercisable portions of such awards may be assumed or substituted by the successor entity, and such awards will remain exercisable for the remainder of the term thereof. Any unexercisable portion of such awards will automatically terminate at the effective time of the change in control.  In addition, if the officer’s employment is terminated by us without cause, other than following a change in control of Veritone, then the exercisable portion of such awards will remain exercisable for the remainder of the term thereof, provided that the officer has not engaged in misconduct, as defined in the 2018 Plan.

22

Other Executive Officers

Pursuant to the stock option agreements entered into with Messrs. Collins and Coyne with respect to stock options that are subject to time-based vesting conditions, in the event of a change in control of Veritone (as defined in the stock option agreements), if any such unvested time-based stock options are not assumed by the acquirer in connection with the change in control, or if the officer is terminated without cause (as defined in the stock option agreements) following the change in control, then all of such unvested stock options will immediately vest.  In addition, if any such unvested stock option is assumed by the acquirer, then, immediately prior to the change in control, the stock option will become vested and exercisable for an additional number of shares equal to the lesser of (a) 25% of the number of shares initially subject to the stock option and (b) the number of shares that have not then vested pursuant to the original vesting schedule, and the remaining unvested stock options (if any) will vest in 12 equal monthly installments following the change in control, or over the remainder of the original vesting schedule, if shorter.

Pursuant to the employment offer letters (as amended) and restricted stock issuance agreements (as amended) entered into with Messrs. Collins and Coyne, in the event of a change in control of Veritone (as defined in the agreements), if the forfeiture restrictions with respect to any unvested restricted shares held by the officer are not assigned to the acquirer, the forfeiture restrictions will lapse and all unvested shares will vest in full immediately prior to the change in control.  In addition, in the event that the officer is terminated without cause (as defined in his employment offer letter), the vesting of a portion of his restricted shares will accelerate in order to compensate him for the taxes paid or payable for the shares which otherwise would be forfeited upon termination.

Pursuant to the restricted stock unit award agreements entered into with Messrs. Collins and Coyne, in the event of a change in control of Veritone (as defined in the agreements), if a restricted stock unit award is not assumed by the acquirer in connection with the change in control, or if the officer’s employment is terminated without cause (as defined in the agreements) following the change in control, any remaining unvested portion of the award shall immediately vest in full.  

The performance-based stock options granted to Messrs. Collins and Coyne under the 2018 Plan are subject to the same terms and conditions in the event of a change in control of Veritone as discussed above.  

Director Compensation

We are eligible to, and have chosen to, comply with the director compensation disclosure rules applicable to a “smaller reporting company,” as defined in applicable SEC rules.

Overview

Our non-employee director compensation program is comprised of the following components:

23

The annual cash retainer fees are paid in quarterly installments.  Our executive officers, Chad Steelberg and Ryan Steelberg, who also serve on our Board, do not receive any additional compensation for their service on our Board.

2019 Director Compensation

The table below sets forth cash compensation earned by each non-employee director, and the grant date fair values of equity awards granted to each non-employee director, during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019.  All compensation of Chad Steelberg and Ryan Steelberg is reported in the Summary Compensation Table on page 20 and has been excluded from the table below.  

24

Acceleration of Vesting of Equity Awards Upon Termination or Change in Control

The RSU agreements entered into with each of our non-employee directors pursuant to the automatic grant provisions of our 2017 Plan provide that, in the event of a change in control of Veritone (as defined in the agreements), or in the event that the director’s service is terminated due to death or permanent disability, all unvested RSUs held by such director will immediately vest.

Other Agreements

Indemnification of Directors and Officers

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and our Bylaws provide that we will indemnify our directors and officers to the fullest extent permitted under Delaware law, which prohibits our amended and restated certificate of incorporation from limiting the liability of our directors for the following:

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation also provides that if Delaware law is amended to authorize corporate action further eliminating or limiting the personal liability of a director, then the liability of our directors will be eliminated or limited to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law, as so amended. This limitation of liability does not apply to liabilities arising under the federal securities laws and does not affect the availability of equitable remedies such as injunctive relief or rescission.

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and our Bylaws also provide that we will indemnify our employees and agents to the fullest extent permitted by law. Our Bylaws also permit us to secure insurance on behalf of any officer, director, employee or other agent for any liability arising out of his or her actions in this capacity, regardless of whether we would have the power to indemnify such person against such expense, liability or loss under the Delaware General Corporation Law. We have obtained directors’ and officers’ liability insurance.

We have entered into separate indemnification agreements with each of our directors and executive officers, in addition to indemnification provided for in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and our Bylaws. These agreements, among other things, provide for indemnification of our directors and executive officers for expenses, judgments, fines and settlement amounts incurred by this person in any action or proceeding arising out of this person’s services as a director or executive officer or at our request. We will not indemnify such director or officer, however, for expenses and the payment of profits arising from the purchase and sale by the director or officer of securities in violation of Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act.

25

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

The Compensation Committee is currently comprised of three non-employee directors: Ms. Nayyar and Messrs. Gehl and Taketa, all of whom served on the Compensation Committee during 2019.  In addition, Messrs. Checketts and Oates served on the Compensation Committee until they resigned from the Board in May 2019 and June 2019, respectively.  None of the members serving on the Compensation Committee currently or during 2019 are or have been our officers or employees, and each member qualifies as an independent director as defined by Rules 5605(a)(2) and (d)(2) of the NASDAQ Listing Rules.  No executive officer serves as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee of any entity that has one or more executive officers serving on our Board or our Compensation Committee.  

Transactions with Related Persons

The following is a description of transactions since January 1, 2018 to which we have been a party in which the amount involved exceeds the lesser of $120,000 or one percent of the average of our total assets at the end of our last two completed fiscal years and in which any of our directors, executive officers or beneficial holders of more than 5% of our common stock, or an affiliate or immediate family member thereof, had or will have a direct or indirect material interest.

Warrants

On August 15, 2016, we entered into an Investment Agreement with Acacia that provided for Acacia to invest up to $50 million in our company, consisting of both debt and equity components. Pursuant to the Investment Agreement, in November 2016, we issued to Acacia three four-year warrants (which were amended in March 2017), each to purchase 51,437 shares of common stock, or an aggregate of 154,311 shares of common stock, which have exercise prices of $13.6088 per share and are currently outstanding.  In addition, upon the closing of our IPO in May 2017, in connection with Acacia’s exercise of a warrant to purchase 2,150,335 shares of our common stock in exchange for cash proceeds of $29.3 million, we issued to Acacia a warrant pursuant to which Acacia has the right to purchase 809,400 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $13.6088 per share, which is currently outstanding. This warrant became exercisable by Acacia with respect to 50% of the shares as of its issuance date and with respect to 50% of the shares in May 2018.  At the time of these transactions, Acacia beneficially owned more than 5% of our common stock.  As of March 5, 2020, Acacia was no longer deemed to beneficially own more than 5% of our common stock.

In March 2017, we entered into a Note Purchase Agreement with Acacia and Veritone LOC I, LLC (“VLOC” and collectively with Acacia, the “Lenders”), which provided for an $8.0 million line of credit (the “Bridge Loan”).  In connection with the Bridge Loan, we issued to the Lenders warrants to purchase an aggregate of 313,440 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $13.6088 per share, which are currently outstanding.  At the time of these transactions, the members of VLOC included entities controlled by Chad Steelberg and Ryan Steelberg, and Mr. Gehl was the Manager of VLOC and was deemed to beneficially own all of the securities held by VLOC. In March 2018, VLOC distributed all of the shares of our common stock and warrants to purchase our common stock held by VLOC to its members.

Voting Agreement

In connection with the investment by Acacia in our securities in August 2016, we entered into a Voting Agreement with Acacia and certain stockholders (the “Holders”), including entities affiliated with Chad Steelberg and Ryan Steelberg (the “Voting Agreement”).  Pursuant to the Voting Agreement, our Board consisted of a total of nine authorized directors, and until May 17, 2019 (the “Voting Period”), Acacia had the right to nominate three directors to our Board and the Holders, voting together as a group, had the right to nominate six directors to our Board.  During the Voting Period, Chad Steelberg and Ryan Steelberg beneficially owned the majority of the shares of our common stock held by the Holders, and, accordingly, were able to designate all six of the Holders’ director nominees.  During the Voting Period, Acacia and the Holders had agreed to vote all of their shares to elect the nine directors nominated by them pursuant to the Voting Agreement.  In addition, pursuant to the Voting Agreement, each of Acacia and the Holders had the right to appoint three designees to attend and participate in the meetings of our Board in a non-voting capacity.

26

In addition to its voting provisions, the Voting Agreement provided that so long as our Board included three directors designated by Acacia, unless approved by a majority of our Board, including at least one director designated by Acacia, we could not take any corporate action, and the Holders could not take any stockholder action, to effect any (i) merger, consolidation or other business combination involving our company, (ii) sale, transfer or other disposition of any capital stock or assets of our company, or (iii) acquisition, license out of the ordinary course of business, or merger or other business combination with a subsidiary of our company, in each case of (i) through (iii), in which the transaction value exceeded $50 million.

The Voting Agreement expired on May 17, 2019.  

Investor Rights Agreement

On July 15, 2014, we entered into an Investor Rights Agreement (as amended, the “Rights Agreement”) with certain of our stockholders. Pursuant to the Rights Agreement, certain stockholders who previously held shares of our Series A preferred stock, Series A-1 preferred stock and Series B preferred stock have certain demand, Form S-3 and piggyback registration rights under the Rights Agreement with respect to the shares of common stock issued upon conversion of such preferred stock, subject to certain limitations. We are required to pay all expenses relating to any such registration by the holders of registrable securities under the Rights Agreement, subject to certain limitations. Such registration rights will expire for each holder upon the earlier of (i) such time as the holder holds less than one percent of our common stock and Rule 144 or another similar exemption under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) is available for the sale of such holder’s shares without limitation during a three-month period without registration and (ii) May 2022, the fifth anniversary of our IPO. The parties to the Rights Agreement include entities that are affiliated with Chad Steelberg and Ryan Steelberg, as well as entities that were previously affiliated with Mr. Oates and Mr. Checketts.

In September 2018, certain of the holders exercised their registration rights under the Rights Agreement, and all shares of our common stock held by such holders at such time have been registered under the Securities Act pursuant to the Registration Statement on Form S-3 that we filed with the SEC on September 28, 2018, which was declared effective on October 5, 2018.

Policies and Procedures for Transactions with Related Persons

Our Board has adopted a written policy setting forth the policies and procedures for the review and approval or ratification of transactions with related persons. This policy covers, with certain exceptions set forth in Item 404 of Regulation S-K under the Securities Act, any transaction, arrangement or relationship, or any series of similar transactions, arrangements or relationships, in which we were or are to be a participant, where the amount involved exceeds $120,000 in any fiscal year and a related person had, has or will have a direct or indirect material interest, including without limitation, purchases of goods or services by or from the related person or entities in which the related person has a material interest, indebtedness, guarantees of indebtedness and employment by us of a related person. In reviewing and approving any such transactions, our Audit Committee is tasked to consider all relevant facts and circumstances, including, but not limited to, whether the transaction is on terms comparable to those that could be obtained in an arm’s length transaction and the extent of the related person’s interest in the transaction. All of the transactions described in this section occurred prior to the adoption of this policy.  

27

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

The following table sets forth specified information with respect to the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of June 2, 2020 by: (1) each of our named executive officers; (2) each of our directors; (3) all of our executive officers and directors as a group; and (4) each person (or group of affiliated persons) who is known by us to beneficially own more than 5% of the outstanding shares of our common stock.

* Less than 1%

28

29

Report of the Audit Committee

Committee Members and Charter

The Audit Committee is currently comprised of three directors.  None of the members serving on the Audit Committee currently or during 2019 are or have been officers or employees of Veritone, Inc. (“Veritone”) and each member qualifies as an independent director as defined by Rule 5605(a)(2) of the NASDAQ Listing Rules and Section 10A(m) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10A-3 promulgated thereunder.  Veritone’s Board has determined that each of Messrs. Graziadio, Kurtz and Taketa is an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by the regulations promulgated by the SEC.

The Audit Committee operates under a written charter adopted by Veritone’s Board.  The Audit Committee reviews its charter on an annual basis.  A copy of the charter of the Audit Committee is available on Veritone’s website at investors.veritone.com.  Veritone will also provide electronic or paper copies of the Audit Committee charter free of charge, upon request made to Veritone’s Secretary.

Role of the Audit Committee

Veritone’s management is responsible for Veritone’s financial reporting process, including its systems of internal control over financial reporting, and for the preparation of its financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.  Veritone’s independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for auditing those financial statements.  The role and responsibility of the Audit Committee is to monitor and review these processes on behalf of the Board.

The members of the Audit Committee are not employees of Veritone and are not, nor do they represent themselves to be, accountants or auditors by profession, and they do not undertake to conduct auditing or accounting reviews or procedures.  Therefore, in performing the Audit Committee’s oversight role, the Audit Committee necessarily must rely on management’s representations that it has maintained appropriate accounting and financial reporting principles and policies, and appropriate internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure compliance with accounting standards and applicable laws and regulations, and that Veritone’s financial statements have been prepared with integrity and objectivity and in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, and on the representations of the independent registered public accounting firm included in its reports on Veritone’s financial statements.

Report of the Audit Committee

The Audit Committee held nine meetings during 2019, including telephonic meetings.  The meetings were designed, among other things, to facilitate and encourage communication among the Audit Committee, management, and Veritone’s independent registered public accounting firm.  In addition to regularly scheduled in-person meetings of the Audit Committee, which correspond with the meetings of the Board, the Audit Committee held a telephonic meeting following the end of each quarter for the purpose of reviewing Veritone’s annual or quarterly financial statements and its proposed public communications regarding its operating results and other financial matters.  

In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the Audit Committee reviewed and discussed with management the audited financial statements of Veritone for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019, including a discussion of the quality, not just the acceptability, of the accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant estimates and judgments, critical accounting policies and the clarity of disclosures in the financial statements.  During 2019, the Audit Committee reviewed Veritone’s quarterly financial statements and its proposed public communications regarding its operating results and other financial matters, and reviewed Veritone’s quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and annual report on Form 10-K, including any amendments thereto, prior to filing.

The Audit Committee reviewed with Grant Thornton LLP (“Grant Thornton”), Veritone’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ended December 31, 2019, who were responsible for expressing an opinion on the conformity of Veritone’s audited financial statements with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, their judgments as to the quality, not just the acceptability, of Veritone’s accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant estimates and judgments, critical accounting policies, the clarity of disclosures in the financial statements, and such other matters as are required to be discussed with the Audit Committee by Public Company Accounting Oversight Board Auditing Standard No. 1301 (Communications with Audit Committees).

30

The Audit Committee discussed with Grant Thornton the overall scope and plans for their annual audit and approved the fees to be paid to Grant Thornton in connection therewith.  The Audit Committee also discussed with management and Grant Thornton the adequacy and effectiveness of Veritone’s disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting.  The Audit Committee met separately with Grant Thornton, without management present, to discuss the results of their examinations and the overall quality of Veritone’s financial reporting.

The Audit Committee also has discussed with Grant Thornton the matters required to be discussed by Public Company Accounting Oversight Board Rule 3526 (Communication with Audit Committees Concerning Independence).  In addition, the Audit Committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from Grant Thornton as required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and the Committee has discussed the independence of Grant Thornton with that firm.  The Audit Committee has concluded that Grant Thornton is independent from Veritone and its management.

Based on the Audit Committee’s review of the matters noted above and its discussions with Veritone’s independent registered public accounting firm and Veritone’s management, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board that the audited financial statements be included in Veritone’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019, including any amendments thereto.

Respectfully submitted,

Knute P. Kurtz, Chairman

G. Louis Graziadio, III

Richard H. Taketa

The material in this report is not “soliciting material” and is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference in any filing of Veritone under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language in any such filing.

31

Proposal Two
Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Audit Committee of our Board has selected Grant Thornton LLP (“Grant Thornton”) as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2020.  Grant Thornton audited our financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019.  Neither our Bylaws nor the Delaware General Corporation Law requires the approval by our stockholders of the selection of our independent registered public accounting firm, but in view of the importance of the financial statements to stockholders, our Board deems it desirable that our stockholders ratify the selection of such firm.

Prior to the Audit Committee’s appointment of Grant Thornton in May 2018, Marcum LLP (“Marcum”) served as our independent registered public accounting firm and audited our financial statements for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016.  On May 18, 2018, the Audit Committee dismissed Marcum and, on the same date, appointed Grant Thornton as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ended December 31, 2018.  

The audit reports of Marcum on our consolidated financial statements for each of the fiscal years ended December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 did not contain an adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion and were not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles, except that Marcum’s report on our consolidated financial statements as of and for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 included an explanatory paragraph indicating that there was substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern as of March 15, 2017, the date of such report. As a result of our financing transactions during 2017, this explanatory paragraph was not included in Marcum’s report on our consolidated financial statements as of and for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017.

During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 and during the subsequent interim period from January 1, 2018 through May 18, 2018, (i) there were no disagreements with Marcum on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure or auditing scope or procedures that, if not resolved to Marcum’s satisfaction, would have caused Marcum to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreement in connection with its reports, and (ii) there were no “reportable events” as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K, except that, in connection with Marcum’s audit of our consolidated financial statements as of and for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, Marcum identified certain deficiencies that rose to the level of a material weakness related to a failure by our management to perform and review reconciliations of certain significant accounts, which resulted in us making material corrections to our expenditures billable to clients and accrued liabilities balances in our consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2016.  Our management implemented remedial measures to address this material weakness, and Marcum did not identify this material weakness in connection with its audit of our consolidated financial statements as of and for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017.  The Audit Committee discussed this material weakness with Marcum.  

The Audit Committee’s determination to dismiss Marcum and appoint Grant Thornton was previously reported on a Current Report on Form 8-K that we filed with the SEC on May 24, 2018. We provided Marcum with a copy of the above disclosures and requested that Marcum furnish us with a letter addressed to the SEC stating whether it agrees with the foregoing statements and, if not, stating the respects in which it does not agree. A copy of the letter from Marcum was filed as Exhibit 16.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 24, 2018.

During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 and during the subsequent interim period from January 1, 2018 through May 18, 2018, neither we nor anyone on our behalf consulted with Grant Thornton regarding either (i) the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on our financial statements, and neither a written report nor oral advice was provided to us that Grant Thornton concluded was an important factor considered by us in reaching a decision as to any accounting, auditing or financial reporting issue, or (ii) any matter that was either the subject of a “disagreement” or a “reportable event,” as such terms are defined in Regulation S-K Items 304(a)(1)(iv) and (v), respectively.

A representative of Grant Thornton will attend the annual meeting, will be given the opportunity to make a statement if he or she so desires, and will be available to respond to appropriate questions submitted by stockholders.

32

If this proposal is not approved, the Audit Committee will reconsider its selection of our independent registered public accounting firm.  Because the Audit Committee has the sole authority to appoint the independent registered public accounting firm, the ultimate decision to retain or appoint Grant Thornton in the future as our independent registered public accounting firm will be made by the Audit Committee based upon the best interests of Veritone at that time.

The Board recommends a vote “FOR” the ratification of the appointment of Grant Thornton as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2020.

Accounting Matters

Principal Independent Auditor Fees

The table below reflects the aggregate fees billed for audit, audit-related, tax and other services rendered by Grant Thornton for our fiscal years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018.  

Audit Fees

Audit fees billed by Grant Thornton for both years consisted of fees for professional services rendered for: (i) the audit of our annual consolidated financial statements; (ii) the review of our consolidated financial statements included in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q; (iii) the review of our registration statements on Form S-3 and Form S-8 filed with the SEC in 2018 and our registration statement on Form S-3 filed with the SEC in 2019; (iv) the review of accounting matters related to our acquisitions of Wazee Digital, Inc., S Media Limited (doing business as Performance Bridge Media), and Machine Box, Inc. in the third quarter of 2018; and (v) reviews related to other reports filed with the SEC.

Audit-Related Fees

Audit-related fees for both years related to financial accounting consultations.

Tax Fees

No tax related services were rendered by Grant Thornton for 2019 or 2018.

All Other Fees

No other services were rendered by Grant Thornton for 2019 or 2018.  

33

Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

Consistent with SEC rules, the Audit Committee has the responsibility for appointing, setting compensation for and overseeing the work of our independent registered public accounting firm.  As such, the Audit Committee has established a policy of pre-approving all audit and permissible non-audit services provided to us by our independent registered public accounting firm.  Prior to engagement, the Audit Committee pre-approves these services by category of service.  The fees are budgeted and the Audit Committee requires the independent registered public accounting firm and management to report actual fees versus the budget periodically throughout the year by category of service.  During the year, circumstances may arise that make it necessary to engage our independent registered public accounting firm for additional services not contemplated in the original pre-approval.  In those instances, the Audit Committee requires specific pre-approval prior to engagement.  All audit and audit-related services provided by Grant Thornton during 2019 were approved by the Audit Committee pursuant to this policy.

The Audit Committee may delegate pre-approval authority to one or more of its members.  The member to whom such authority is delegated must report, for informational purposes only, any pre-approval decisions to the Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting.

The Audit Committee reviewed and discussed the services, in addition to audit services, rendered by Grant Thornton during 2019, as well as the fees paid therefor, and has determined that the provision of such other services by Grant Thornton, and the fees paid therefor, were compatible with maintaining Grant Thornton’s independence.

34

Proposal Three
Approval of Amendments to 2018 Performance-Based Stock Incentive Plan
and Performance-Based Stock Options

Overview

On June 12, 2020, the Compensation Committee, and the disinterested members of our Board, authorized, subject to stockholder approval, certain amendments (the “Amendments”) to our 2018 Performance-Based Stock Incentive Plan (the “2018 Plan”), the stock option award agreements entered into pursuant to the 2018 Plan, and certain stock option award agreements entered into pursuant to our 2017 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2017 Plan”) on substantially the same terms as the stock option award agreements entered into pursuant to the 2018 Plan (collectively, the “Performance Awards”), as follows:

If approved by our stockholders, the Compensation Committee intends to make the Amendments to the 2018 Plan and the Performance Awards pursuant to its authority under Section 3.5(a) of the 2018 Plan and Section 3.7(a) of the 2017 Plan.  

The Board adopted the 2018 Plan and granted Performance Awards thereunder and under the 2017 Plan to provide the recipients with significant grants of nonstatutory stock options that would become exercisable only if Veritone achieves stock price milestones that would represent significant increases over the trading price of our common stock at the time of grant (the closing price of our common stock on May 4, 2018, the last trading day before the approval of the Performance Awards to our CEO and our President, was $21.25 per share).  The Board believed that the Performance Awards would strongly incentivize the recipients to remain employed with Veritone and to deliver strong performance over time.  However, over the past two years, we have experienced a significant decline in the trading price of our common stock, which has made the current Stock Price Milestones applicable to the Performance Awards significantly more difficult to achieve, to the point where most recipients do not view them (particularly the second and third Stock Price Milestones) as reasonably achievable.  As a result, the Performance Awards have lost much of their retention and incentive value.

Approval of the Amendments will enable us to leverage the outstanding Performance Awards, which currently have vesting triggers that are significantly above the current trading price of our common stock, for the purposes for which they were originally intended, which is primarily to motivate and retain our executive officers and other employees, and to incentivize behavior that will significantly increase the overall value of our Company, thereby directly aligning the interests of the recipients and our stockholders.

For the reasons described below, our board of directors believes the Amendments are in the best interests of our company and our stockholders, and our Board recommends that our stockholders vote for approval of the Amendments.

35

Background and Principal Reasons for the Amendments

In January 2018, the Board began preliminary discussions about how to provide a significant incentive for Chad Steelberg, our CEO, Ryan Steelberg, our President, and our other employees to achieve our aggressive growth goals and thereby drive significant increases in stockholder value. In May 2018, a Special Committee comprised of three independent and disinterested members of the Board approved grants of Performance Awards of 1,809,900 options to Chad Steelberg and 1,357,425 options to Ryan Steelberg, and our Board subsequently approved the 2018 Plan for purposes of grants of Performance Awards to other Veritone team members, subject to stockholder approval.  The 2018 Plan and the grants of Performance Awards thereunder to our CEO and our President were approved by our stockholders in June 2018.

Subsequent to the grants of Performance Awards to our CEO and our President, the Compensation Committee also approved grants of Performance Awards under the 2018 Plan to our other employees, as well as grants of Performance Awards under the 2017 Plan having substantially the same terms as the Performance Awards granted under the 2018 Plan.

The 2018 Plan and the Performance Awards are 100% at-risk and will become exercisable only if the specified Stock Price Milestones are achieved. Under the Performance Awards as currently in effect, one-third of the options under each Performance Award will become exercisable if our stock price increases to $49.15 per share, one-third will become exercisable if our stock price increases to $98.31 per share, and one-third will become exercisable if our stock price increases to $196.62 per share.  

The exercise price of the Performance Awards granted to our CEO and our President is currently $21.25 per share, which was the closing price of our common stock on May 4, 2018, the last trading day before the approval by the Special Committee of such Performance Awards.  Due to the decline in our stock price subsequent to the grant of the Performance Awards to our CEO and our President, the Performance Awards later granted to other Veritone employees have exercise prices ranging from $4.65 to $8.34 per share.

Between June 2018 and March 2020, we experienced a material decline in the trading price of our common stock. We believe our stock price decline has been the result of various market forces and other factors, including sales of a substantial number of shares by a significant shareholder, delays in obtaining FedRAMP certification for our aiWARE Government platform, delays in the development of our business with Federal, State and local government customers, and our need to finance our operations by issuing significant new shares of our common stock. The closing price of our common stock declined from a high of $24.16 per share in June 2018 to a low of $1.52 per share in March 2020. As of June 11, 2020, the closing price of our common stock was $11.97 per share.

As a result of this trading price decline, the current Stock Price Milestones applicable to the Performance Awards require a much greater increase in our stock price in order for the Performance Awards to become exercisable, as follows:

Due to this decline in our stock price, most recipients do not view the current Stock Price Milestones (and particularly the second and third Stock Price Milestones) as reasonably achievable.  As a result, the Performance Awards have lost much of their retention and incentive value.  

In addition, the Performance Awards granted to our CEO and our President have exercise prices that significantly exceed the recent trading prices of our common stock, which further reduces their potential value to these key employees.  

We believe that the Performance Awards represent a key tool for us to retain and incentivize our executive officers and other employees to remain with Veritone and deliver performance that will significantly increase the overall value of our Company, to the benefit of all of our stockholders.  We rely on our executive officers and other employees to help us achieve our business plans and strategic objectives, and the risk of failing to retain key personnel is particularly acute as we are still in the process of developing our business.

36

Due to the decline in our stock price, the Performance Awards have lost their potential economic benefit to these employees, thereby eroding their effectiveness as an economic incentive to remain in our employ, while nevertheless creating an equity overhang. Many of our employees have been working for us for a number of years and have developed skills or knowledge that would be difficult to replace and attractive to our competitors, especially in the case of key management, engineering and sales personnel.

Additionally, under applicable accounting rules, we are required to continue to recognize compensation expense related to the Performance Awards over their estimated service periods, even if they never become exercisable because the applicable Stock Price Milestones are not met. We believe the Amendments will allow us to recapture retention and incentive value from the compensation expense that we have recorded in our financial statements with respect to the Performance Awards, and to continue to capture retention and incentive value from the compensation expense that we are required to recognize for the remainder of the estimated service periods. By amending the Performance Awards, we can provide enhanced retention and incentive value while only incurring incremental compensation expense, which we believe will allow us to use our equity award resources more efficiently.

Beginning in February 2020, the Compensation Committee began to consider alternatives for addressing the lack of retention or incentive value of the Performance Awards resulting from the decline in our stock price.  At that time, our stock price had declined to approximately $3.00 per share.  In connection with this review, the Compensation Committee gave extensive consideration to the structure and terms of the 2018 Plan and the Performance Awards, as well as the retention and incentive issues it had identified with the Performance Awards, to identify modifications to the 2018 Plan and the Performance Awards that would best address our strategic goals and compensation objectives.  The Compensation Committee reviewed multiple alternatives for addressing these issues, including the Amendments and offering to repurchase the outstanding Performance Awards.  Following careful review and analysis, our Compensation Committee determined that the Amendments were the most attractive means to accomplish these goals and objectives for several reasons:

Based on the foregoing, our Compensation Committee determined that the Amendments are the most effective means available to us to restore incentives for and properly motivate our executive officers and other employees.

37

Summary of the Amendments

Amendment of the Stock Price Milestones.  The Stock Price Milestones related to each of the Performance Awards would be amended as follows:

The Compensation Committee and the Board believe that the amended Stock Price Milestones create an appropriate balance between representing challenging performance goals and significant increases in our stock price, and levels that are realistically achievable with significant effort and strong performance.  If these challenging milestones are met, all Veritone stockholders should benefit significantly. As such, the amended Performance Awards are a “pay-for-performance” compensation program that aligns the interests of our executive officers and other employees with the interests of Veritone and its stockholders.

Amendment of Exercise Prices of Underwater Performance Awards. The exercise prices of the Performance Awards held by our CEO and our President would be amended to be $11.97 per share (the closing price of our common stock on June 11, 2020, the last trading day before the approval of the Amendments).

The Compensation Committee and the Board believe that, to maximize the incentive for our CEO and our President to drive performance that increases the value of our Company significantly, it is in the best interests of Veritone and our stockholders to reduce the exercise prices of these Performance Awards to our current stock price level, thereby aligning their interests directly with those of our stockholders.

Amendment to Post-Termination Exercise Period Under Certain Circumstances.  Section 3.1(d) of the 2018 Plan currently provides that, with respect to our CEO and our President, upon his separation from service (as defined in the 2018 Plan) other than for his misconduct (as defined in the 2018 Plan), the portion of his Performance Award that is exercisable (or becomes exercisable in accordance with the terms of the 2018 Plan) will remain exercisable until the earlier of two (2) years following his separation from service and expiration of the 10-year term of the Performance Award.  Section 3.1(d) of the 2018 Plan would be amended to provide that, if the officer’s service as an employee or as a member of the Board is terminated by us other than for misconduct (as defined in the 2018 Plan), then the exercisable portion of the Performance Award will remain exercisable for the remainder of the 10-year term thereof.  

The Compensation Committee and the Board believe that, to maximize the incentive for our CEO and our President to drive performance that increases the value of our Company significantly, it is in the best interests of Veritone and our stockholders to extend the exercisability of their Performance Awards, thereby maximizing their potential value to the officer.  As the Performance Awards will only become exercisable in the event that they have led the Company to achieve these increases in stockholder value, in the event the officer’s employment is subsequently terminated by the Company other than for Cause, the Board believes that it is fair and appropriate for our CEO and our President to be able to continue to exercise their vested Performance Awards for the remainder of the 10-year term.

Removal of Limits on Future Equity Awards.  Section 2.1(f) of the 2018 Plan, which provides that, unless determined otherwise by a committee of independent and disinterested Board members, neither our CEO nor our President shall be eligible to receive additional equity awards under the 2018 Plan or 2017 Plan, would be deleted from the 2018 Plan.

The Compensation Committee and the Board believe that equity compensation is a critical component of our executive compensation program, and that incentivizing the continued services and performance of our CEO, Chad Steelberg, and our President, Ryan Steelberg, is critical to the continued growth and long-term interests of Veritone. We rely heavily on the leadership of Chad Steelberg and Ryan Steelberg, who co-founded Veritone and are the visionaries behind our technology and our business strategies.  The Compensation Committee and the Board believe that it is critical to give the Compensation Committee, which is comprised solely of independent directors, the flexibility to grant additional equity awards to our CEO and our President in the future if it determines that it is in the best interests of Veritone and its stockholders to do so.  This may be particularly important in the event that, due to our financial position, the Compensation Committee determines that it is better to provide a higher proportion of their total compensation packages using equity awards rather than cash.  

38

Other Terms

Eligible Performance Awards.  All Performance Awards held by executive officers and other employees who are employed in good standing with Veritone as of the date of approval of the Amendments by our stockholders will be eligible for the Amendments. As of June 11, 2020, outstanding Performance Awards representing a total of 4,165,242 shares were held by 223 employees eligible for the Amendments. Because the Amendments are principally designed to improve the incentive and retention qualities of our Performance Awards, former executive officers and other former employees are excluded from participating in the Amendments.

No Other Changes to 2018 Plan or Performance Awards.  Except for the Amendments, all terms of the 2018 Plan and the outstanding Performance Awards will be unchanged, and the Performance Awards will remain in effect in accordance with their current terms.

Implementation of Amendments Following Stockholder Approval. If we receive the required stockholder approval, the Compensation Committee intends to make the Amendments to the 2018 Plan and the Performance Awards pursuant to its authority under Section 3.5(a) of the 2018 Plan and Section 3.7(a) of the 2017 Plan immediately following such approval.

New Plan Benefits

The table below reflects the shares of common stock underlying the outstanding Performance Awards held by each of our named executive officers, all of our executive officers as a group, and all non-executive employees who are employed in good standing with Veritone as of June 11, 2020 as a group.  None of our non-executive directors hold Performance Awards.

The aggregate potential intrinsic values of each Performance Award if all three new milestones are achieved, as of the date of achievement of the third award milestone, calculated using the third share price goal of $27.50, less the option exercise prices of $11.97 per share for Chad Steelberg and Ryan Steelberg and $5.65 per share for Messrs. Collins and Coyne, are $28.1 million for Chad Steelberg, $21.1 million for Ryan Steelberg, $0.6 million for Peter F. Collins and $0.6 million for Jeffrey B. Coyne. If all three new milestones are achieved, then the value of the 27,098,995 million shares of Veritone’s common stock outstanding as of June 2, 2020 would increase by $482.4 million over the value of such shares as of that date, to a total value of $745.2 million.

The Company will not grant any options or other awards in connection with the Amendments or any further options under the 2018 Plan. The Compensation Committee will determine the terms and number of stock options or other awards to be granted in the future under the 2017 Plan in its discretion. Since no determinations regarding awards or grants to be granted in the future have yet been made, the benefits or amounts that will be received by or allocated to the Company’s executive officers or other eligible employees or non-employee directors cannot be determined at this time.

39

Information Regarding Existing Equity Compensation Plans

The following table sets forth information with respect to securities authorized for issuance under our equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2019:

Equity Compensation Plan Information at 2019 Fiscal Year End

Summary of U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of Amendments

The following is a summary of the anticipated material U.S. federal income tax consequences of the Amendments.

The amendment of the Performance Awards pursuant to the Amendments should be treated as a non-taxable event and the holders of amended Performance Awards generally should recognize no income for U.S. federal income tax purposes upon the Amendments. However, the tax consequences for holders outside the U.S. may differ.

40

Accounting Impact

Under ASC Topic 718, Compensation - Stock Compensation, we would recognize incremental compensation expense of the amended Performance Awards, if any. The incremental compensation expense would be measured as the excess, if any, of the fair values of the amended Performance Awards, measured as of the date of the Amendments, over the fair values of the original Performance Awards, measured immediately before the Amendments. We would recognize this incremental stock-based compensation expense over the derived service period calculated by the Monte Carlo simulation model. As the fair values of the amended Performance Awards pursuant to ASC Topic 718 have not yet been determined, we cannot currently estimate the amount or schedule of the incremental compensation expense, if any, to be recognized for the amended Performance Awards.

Interest of Certain Persons in or Opposition to Matter to be Acted Upon

In considering the recommendation of our Board with respect to the approval of the Amendments, stockholders should be aware that our executive officers have direct interests in the adoption of this proposal, which may present them with conflicts of interest in connection with the recommendation and adoption of this proposal. As discussed above, our named executive officers and other employees are eligible to participate in the Amendments to the extent they hold Performance Awards. Therefore, in recommending adoption of this proposal to our stockholders, our Board recognizes, and our stockholders should be aware, that approval of this proposal may benefit certain of our executive officers.

Vote Required

Approval of this proposal requires (1) the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the total votes of shares of our common stock cast in person or by proxy at the annual meeting, pursuant to the rules of NASDAQ and our Bylaws, and (2) the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the total votes of shares of our common stock cast in person or by proxy at the annual meeting other than shares of our common stock owned, directly or indirectly, by Chad Steelberg or Ryan Steelberg and their affiliates cast in person or by proxy at the annual meeting, pursuant to the resolutions of the Board and the Compensation Committee approving the Amendments.  Proxies received in response to this solicitation will be voted in favor of the approval of the Amendments unless otherwise specified in the proxy.

The Board recommends a vote “FOR” approval of the Amendments to the 2018 Plan and the Performance Awards.

41

VERITONE, INC.  575 ANTON BOULEVARD  SUITE 100  COSTA MESA, CA 92626  VOTE BY INTERNET Before The Meeting - Go to www.proxyvote.com  Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of  information. Vote by 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time on July 23, 2020. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain  your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.  During The Meeting - Go to www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/VERI2020  You may attend the meeting via the Internet and vote during the meeting. Have  the information that is printed in the box marked by the arrow available and follow the instructions.  VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903  Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions. Vote by 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time on July 23, 2020. Have your proxy card in hand when  you call and then follow the instructions.  VOTE BY MAIL  Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.                 TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:D18374-P42156 KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED. DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY VERITONE, INC. For Withhold For All To withhold authority to vote for any individual    The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR All All Except nominee(s), mark "For All Except" and write the        number(s) of the nominee(s) on the line below.    the following:                  1.    Election of Directors !  !  !    Nominees:  1) G. Louis Graziadio, III 2) Chad Steelberg 3) Ryan Steelberg  The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR proposals 2 and 3.  2. Ratification of appointment of Grant Thornton LLP as Veritone's independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2020.  3. Approval of amendments to Veritone's 2018 Performance-Based Stock Incentive Plan and performance-based stock options.  Note: In their discretion, the proxies are authorized to vote upon such other business as may properly be brought before the meeting.          For  Against  Abstain  !!!  !!!           Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer.     Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]DateSignature (Joint Owners)Date              

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting:  The Notice and Proxy Statement, Form 10-K/A and Form 10-K are available at www.proxyvote.com.                   D18375-P42156     VERITONE, INC.  2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders  Friday, July 24, 2020 9:30 AM, PT  This proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors  Peter F. Collins and Jeffrey B. Coyne, or either of them, each with the power of substitution, are hereby authorized to represent and to vote the shares of the undersigned, with all the powers which the undersigned would possess if personally present, at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Veritone, Inc. to be held on Friday, July 24, 2020 at 9:30 AM, Pacific Time, as a virtual meeting via the Internet at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/VERI2020, and any adjournment or postponement thereof.  Shares represented by this proxy will be voted as directed by the stockholder. If no such directions are indicated, the proxies will have authority to vote FOR proposal 1, FOR proposal 2 and FOR proposal 3.  In their discretion, the proxies are authorized to vote upon such other business as my properly come before the meeting.               Continued and to be signed on reverse side